Please feel free to post with questions or comments about studying in Canada!
Forum rules
Our rules are simple:
- Spam will not be tolerated
- Never use abusive or offensive language
- ABSOLUTELY NO marketing or promotional links allowed

All links posted in our forums are "nofollow" and carry no search engine weight.

If you wish to advertise or promote a service you offer to international students, please see the appropriate forum for Advertising/ Promotion. It's very simple, fail to adhere to these guidelines and you will be banned and removed - your are only wasting our time and your time!


Postby Capitalist » Thu, 10 Oct 2013 11:33:05 -0500


The debate whether or not active or passive management is superior has been raging on for years. However, there's no clear winner. There square measure execs and cons for each types of investment. in additional economical markets like us, majority of passive funds tend to exceed actively managed funds. However, in developing and rising markets like India, actively managed funds square measure seemingly to exceed passive funds.

Actively managed funds square measure funds whereby the fund manager actively manages the portfolio with associate objective to exceed the benchmark. Passive funds square measure funds whose portfolios would replicate the constituents of a benchmark index and returns of those funds would be in line with the returns of the benchmark index.

Investor outlook

An capitalist giving his hard-earned cash to a fund manager for investments expects the fund manager to exceed a minimum of the benchmark. it's not prudent for the capitalist to buy the additional fund management charges if the fund manager isn't ready to deliver alpha systematically. or else, the capitalist will place his cash in passive funds. These funds have lower prices, square measure less risky and deliver returns in line with the benchmark indices.

But that one is better? What ought to have associate capitalist have in his portfolio basket? Before we have a tendency to answer this question we'd like to appear at the execs and cons of each active and passive managed funds.

Fund choice is that the key

Selection of applicable funds is very important if associate capitalist desires to earn superior alpha over the benchmark. Investors ought to take the recommendation of a monetary consultant before investment in mutual funds. If any capitalist doesn't wish to require the danger of underperformance then he will verify investment in passive funds. Passive funds track benchmark indices and endeavour to copy the performance of a given index. for instance, a fund chase the groovy as benchmark, would replicate the returns generated by groovy.

Passive funds neutralise the danger of fund managers. Such funds take away the human component that's concerned in managing actively managed funds. Also, passive funds square measure economical and value effective as compared to actively managed funds.

Posts: 1
Joined: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 11:32:06 -0500

Return to “%s” Study in Canada

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests